And God Said
Detective Robert R. Surgenor
A father
who was experiencing defiance with his fifteen year old son told me
that he had never spanked his boy because as Christians, we are forbidden
from "provoking our children to wrath." This dad had decided
that since spanking his son would make him mad, it was forbidden in
the Bible. Dad was referring to Ephesians 6:4 (And, ye fathers, provoke
not your children to wrath) and Colossians 3:21 (Fathers, provoke not
your children to anger, lest they be discouraged.)
These two
verses, although in separate books of the Bible, compliment each other.
The word "provoke" in Ephesians 6:4 in the original Greek
text is "parorgizo" (pronounced "par-org-id'-zo) which
means to "exasperate." Most Bible scholars feel that in it's
context, this word refers to an antagonistic parent who belittles or
is unfairly critical, causing a child to be angry. This is indeed true,
and the remainder of the verse seems to substantiate this thought. The
word "discouraged" in Colossians 3:21 is "athumeo"
(pronounced "ath-oo-meh'-o") which means to be disheartened.
The meaning here is the same. The child who is unreasonably punished
becomes dysfunctional, unable to relate to others in a normal manner.
This is the truly an "abused" child.
But there
is another viable interpretation to these two verses. As a policeman,
I have encountered many young people who seem to be "angry "
at the world. There seems to be no reasonable explanation for their
antagonistic attitude. These youngsters have grown up in wealthy families,
with all of their needs provided for. There is only one element missing
in their upbringing. That missing factor is discipline.
I believe
that this may be the other meaning in Ephesians 6:4 and Colossians 3:21.
Much of the "exasperation" in today's youth, which is causing
millions of children to be "discouraged," is being caused
by parents who fail to discipline their children when even the child
knows it is appropriate. It is inherent in children to interpret restrictions
on their behavior as love. That feeling of being loved is re-enforced
when the child is punished for wrongdoing. I feel that these scriptures
not only refer to the abused child, they also refer to the child who
is "left to himself" and angry with his parents for raising
him in such a manner.
Proverbs
29:15 is the verse I refer to as "parenting in a nutshell."
Much like John 3:16 is to the gospel, this verse in Proverbs says it
all about parenting. Each word holds a great deal of meaning. The complexities
of the verse are at first, not easily recognized, but like all other
Bible verses, its full meaning is revealed when studied diligently.
The verse
reads "The rod and reproof give wisdom, but a child left to himself
bringeth his mother to shame." There are several main elements
to this verse, the most important being the words "rod" and
"reproof." These two words, placed strategically into the
verse, cannot be moved, altered, or changed without changing the entire
meaning of the verse. There is one important point to keep in mind when
dissecting this portion of Scripture. The word "rod," in it's
original Hebrew text, is "shebet" (pronounced shay'-bet).
In the context of this verse, the word means an instrument of force,
or the use of corporal punishment against the child as a form of discipline.
The word "reproof," in it's context "towkechah,"
(pronounced to-kay-khaw'), means reproof, rebuke, or a lecture given
to the child for edification by the mind and soul. In almost all anti-spanking
literature, the NSA attempts to interpret the "rod" as "loving
guidance," implying that shepherds used the rod to guide their
sheep rather than to beat them. The NSA contends that the rod is actually
the reproof. In this verse, the meaning of the word "rod"
is completely different than the word "reproof." These two
words would not have been used in the same verse if they meant the same
thing!
What the
child receives through a series of spankings and lectures by their parents
is "wisdom." Wisdom is not something we are born with. We
accumulate wisdom as we grow, through advice and experience. Notice
that the verse includes both of these parenting techniques, the rod
AND reproof. One will not work well without the other! Too much of the
rod and no reproof (usually in single father families) results in a
child who is very regimented and disciplined, but has very little compassion
or affection for others. The extremes in these cases turn out to be
volunteer soldiers or mercenaries. Those raised in a home with all reproof
and no rod (usually single mother families) end up having very little
respect for authority and tend to involve themselves in ventures where
they have power over others. You will find this attitude in the most
extreme environmentalist and animal rights activists. These groups tend
to defy normal cultural or societal authority in order to protect (have
authority over) animals and plants that cannot defend themselves. I
believe this is one of the causes for the differences between liberals
and conservatives.
The second
portion of the verse, "a child left to himself bringeth his mother
to shame," details the results of a child who does not experience
the "rod and reproof." A child who is "left to himself"
is one who is deliberately not disciplined by his parents. "Left,"
in the original Hebrew text "shalach," (pronounced shaw-lakh'),
means to let loose, to let go, or set free. These are children who are
"empowered" by their parents. This is the child who is "left
to himself" when a decision must be made concerning his welfare.
This is the child who is "left to himself" to decide how to
dress. This is the child who is "left to himself" to decide
his curfew. This is the child who is "left to himself" when
he talks back to his parents. This is the child that I end up arresting
for crimes against society.
In other
articles, we will examine other Bible verses that address corporal punishment.
You will see that God not only recommends that we spank our children
for defiant behavior, He demands it